Local exhibition shooters aim high

Filed in winchester travel Leave a comment

It could be Brady to Branch.

“Jerome just says, ‘Hey Colin,’ and I know something is going in the air,” said Colin Micklon.

For exhibition shooters Micklon and Jerome Holt, “something” could be a traditional clay pigeon – or an onion, a charcoal briquette, a hockey puck or whatever else one man may toss in the air for the other to shoot.

Holt, of Bethel, and Micklon, of Fryeburg, are “Team Zespy,” the only two-person professional exhibition shooting show in the U.S., according to Holt.

The two men met only a year ago, but since then they have created intricate exhibition routines that include tossing shotguns to each other simultaneously, loading them, and shooting, all in the three seconds before the clays or other objects hit the ground.

They have developed a reputation impressive enough to earn an invitation to the national “Shot Show” in Las Vegas next month.

Holt and Micklon both learned to shoot at an early age.

For Micklon, who grew up in Lovell, it was 9. “I’ve had a lifelong love of guns and collecting,” he said. “I’ve always had shotguns.”

Holt started at 5, taught by his father, who was a Navy chief gunner’s mate in World War II and Viet Nam.

In fact, both Holt and the shooting team are named after his dad’s best friend from the Navy – Jerome Zespy.

Holt learned to shoot a variety of firearms, including shotguns, Thompson machine guns and 50-caliber machine guns.

“my father got free ammo from the Navy,” said Holt. “It was supposed to be dumped overboard, but he got permission to keep it.”

The young Holt was a quick study. by 8, he could outshoot some state troopers with their own pistols, he said.

To challenge himself and keep target practice interesting, he made up unusual targets, such as a vitamin pill stuck to a Band Aid at 70 yards distance. Another trick was placing an ax head backwards in a log and shooting at the sharp edge from 40 yards, splitting the bullet on impact.

He continued to shoot as an adult, but much of his time was taken up in establishing the business he operates today, Eagle Earthworks.

Then in 2005 he saw a television show featuring Tom Knapp, a world famous exhibition shooter who was sponsored by the Benelli gun company.

“I watched it and said, ‘I can do that,’” said Holt. “I took an old Winchester rifle to L.L. Cote’s [in Errol, N.H.] and told them I was looking for a Benelli,” he said.

He turned in the 115-year-old rifle for a Benelli shotgun, and started practicing.

Not long after, Knapp did an exhibition at the Kittery Trading Post. Holt attended and met him, and Knapp invited him to participate in the show.

Holt continued his efforts to make contacts in the field. a practice session of three hours can take 1,000 rounds of ammunition, at a cost of about $320, so finding a sponsor helps a shooter finance his development.

Holt met a Benelli representative and asked him about becoming an exhibition shooter sponsored by the company. he was told Benelli averages a call a week from shooters looking for sponsorships.

“you have to be a great shot, communicate well, and entertain,” the rep told him.

Holt kept practicing, and in 2008 set up a couple of small, informal shows on his property.

He also met Benelli exhibition shooter Tim Bradley, helping him set up for a show at L.L. Bean’s, and even sharing a tip to help Bradley load his gun faster.

Holt eventually talked his way into an exhibition arrangement with Cabela’s of Scarborough, but the plan fell through when his contact there left his job. “I was in limbo for a couple of years,” said Holt. a partnership

Then last year on a job in Lovell, he met Micklon, owner of Micklon Tree and Landscaping.

“we talked about guns, and became good friends right away,” said Micklon, who had no experience in trick shooting or shooting exhibitions.

Holt invited him to a shooting event in Scarborough, and talked to him more about the idea of exhibitions. In Micklon Holt saw motivation, determination and ability, along with a desire to constantly improve.

In early winter the two started shooting together.

A shared competitive attitude drove each to try to best the other. “we challenge each other,” said Holt.

They worked out routines to interact with each other as they prepared to shoot, aided by the fact that Holt is left-handed and Micklon right.

“We’re facing each other all the time,” said Holt.

They tossed clays in the air, spinning 360 or 720 degrees before shooting. they tossed the shotguns to each other before loading them. they shot the guns upside down.

Some of their combinations produced 24 shots in 12 seconds.

They also looked for different objects to toss and shoot. Micklon is a golfer, so he tried shooting golf balls, “driving” them 250 yards with the shotgun.

Holt spotted a hockey puck at Micklon’s house, and they tried that, shooting it 300 feet straight up in the air.

They even filled a ping pong ball with a powdered substance that made it explode when hit with shot.

As their routines grew, they started thinking seriously about an exhibition team.

“This spring we began making a push for Team Zespy,” said Holt.

They did their first exhibition together July 15, at the Scarborough Fish and Game. they did another in Carrabassett Valley. The pair incorporated “audience request” tricks, which they improvised on the spot.

They’re planning other exhibitions for youth organizations.

“we want to get more people involved,” said Holt, and particularly teach young people that guns can be used as tools, if safety procedures are correctly followed.

They also hope to generally increase their exposure, to take their routine to the next level.

“as professional shooters, we’d like to go national,” Holt said. “there are only 10 or 12 in the country. we are the only ones who are a team. we think that’s our niche.”

Accomplishing that will require some serious sponsorships. Holt estimates that at that level, the supplies for practice alone costs $35,000 a year, per shooter. then there are travel expenses.

They got some good publicity in October, when they were featured in a segment of “bill Green’s Maine,” on WCSH 6 television.

Team Zespy’s chance to take the next big step will come in mid-January, at the Shot show in Las Vegas.

“there are 6,100 vendors there. It’s by invitation only,” said Holt. “we were invited by Benelli.”

The pair plans to make 50 DVDs of their routines to distribute, and they are hoping the gun world will take notice.

But whatever happens, Holt and Micklon will always keep in mind what has brought them this far.

“The biggest thing is we have fun,” said Holt.

<a href="http://www.bethelcitizen.com/node/13071/tag:news.google.com,2005:cluster=http://www.bethelcitizen.com/node/13071/Thu, 08 Dec 2011 05:20:34 GMT”>Local exhibition shooters aim high

, , ,

Digital Gun Safe? 3 Things You Must Think About Before Buying

Filed in winchester events Leave a comment

What’s a digital gun safe? It’s a safe that either uses a keypad to open your safe, or just detects you fingerprint.

Are digital models better than the standard lock and key safe?

It depends on your circumstances. if you live in a high crime area, than you definitely should invest in a digital model.

Why?

This is because you get access to your guns faster in the event somebody is breaking. After all, if someone is breaking into your house, you might not have time to get your key.

That’s where digital gun safes come in.

All you do is input the code or wave your finger, and the safe will open.

But it can also keep your kids out.

You obviously don’t want your kids finding the key to the safe. That’s another advantage of the digital models.

So how do you find the best digital safe? There are a few factors you have to keep in mind. here are 3 of the most important:

#1) Steel thickness

The thicker the steel, the more secure the safe is going to be. the thicker the steel, the harder the time somebody will have hacking their way in.

#2) Bolted in

If you opt for a safe that bolts into a floor or wall, it will be pricier. this is because a thief can’t pick it up and carry it with them, where they can attempt to break in later. this is just another level of security.

#3) fire safety

Protecting you valuables in the event of a fire is one of the most important things about a safe. some of the better ones can withstand 1400 degree fires for 30 minutes. the better the fire ratings, the more you should consider it.

The bottom line is, there are many digital gun safes for sale. When you implement these tips, you will find the right one very quickly.

Digital Gun Safe? 3 Things You Must Think About Before Buying

, , , ,

Limited Edition Winchester Hogue 1300 Overrubber Shotgun Stock 12Inch LOP Kit

Filed in winchester shotgun Leave a comment

OverMolding provides the ultimate in a comfortable non-slip super smooth attractive finish that is durable and extremely quiet. the exclusive Cobblestone texture further enhances all Hogue stocks by providing an efficient non-slip non irritating stippling pattern. OverMolded Stocks are constructed by molding a super strong rigid fiberglass reinforced skeleton or insert that precisely fits the guns action. This rigid skeleton is then OverMolded with a durable but soft synthetic elastomer rubber . during the heat and extreme pressure of injection molding the elastomer adheres chemically as well as mechanically to the skeleton resulting in a permanent bond between the rubber and the insert. the super strong skeleton gives the stocks their strength and the precise molded dimensions provide a perfect drop-in fit of your rifle or shotgun. the state of the art elastomer material used on Hogue stocks won t harden with age and is virtually impervious to all oils and solvents found around firearms providing years of dependable service. fits 1300 Winchester OverRubber Shotgun Stock 12 L.O.P Kit w forend.

Limited Edition Winchester Hogue 1300 Overrubber Shotgun Stock 12Inch LOP Kit

, , , ,

Oklahoma has plans to update, unify court record system

Filed in winchester job Leave a comment

Copyright ©2010. The associated Press. Produced by NewsOK.com all rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.  

Plans are under way to roll out a new $30 million case management system for the state’s courts, moving away from paper-based to electronic processes and joining up all district and appeals courts under the same system.

Currently, 13 counties in the state, including Tulsa and Oklahoma counties, use one case management system; 64 other counties use another. Officials say the state has outgrown the old systems. Officials hope to have the system complete and all state trial courts online within the next five years. Often, data retrieved from the courts is used to make policy decisions by lawmakers. it also is sent to law enforcement; including state and federal agencies that use the data to prevent criminals and the mentally ill from buying guns and for background checks. “I will be able to look at court records without getting out of my chair,” said Mike Evans, administrative director of the courts. “Our prime focus is a unified system across all 77 counties.” an integrated system will give the public remote access to electronic case files and court documents. Attorneys and legal representatives will be able to file documents electronically, and judges will have the ability to manage their dockets and assess cases within the system. Scheduling cases also will be a part of its function. it also will give judges and court clerks more efficient tools to manage and track cases, and a simpler way of collecting and dispersing fees it takes in for other agencies, Evans said. Clerks are responsible for collecting fees that help fund more than 30 state agencies. Fines and fees will be payable online and delinquent accounts tracked more easily for collections purposes. More openness an overarching goal of this is to keep the courts accountable to the public, said state Supreme Court Justice James Winchester. Winchester was chief justice four years ago when talks about a new statewide system began. He said this system will make Oklahoma a model for other states to follow. In 2007, fees increased on most civil and criminal court filings from $10 to $25 to pay for the cost of the new system. Winchester said it will cost about $28 million to implement. While the transition is made, the other two systems will remain accessible. “Of my 25 years on the bench, this will be the most significant project and contribution in my career,” Winchester said. The most significant contribution, he said, is the public will have more access, not just judges and attorneys. The new system will help the state Supreme Court and court managers use resources better by accurately reporting caseloads and docket information, Winchester said. If one district is overloaded with cases and another isn’t, it will allow court managers to see that and put judges where they’re needed. Winchester said the system also will help businesses. “Business relies heavily on these records; this will help Main Street businesses who’ve helped pay for this system to do their job better,” he said. Virginia-based American Cadastre was awarded the contract in November. they are constructing the system based on input and decisions made by judges, court clerks and staff that use existing systems. Paperless system The ultimate goal will be for courts to shift to a paperless system. At the Oklahoma County courthouse, paper files and records fill entire rooms. At an off-site storage unit for records, there are stacks of boxes containing files dating back to statehood. “We take in an enormous amount of paper on a daily basis,” said Oklahoma County Court Clerk Patricia Presley. “This new system will enable us to serve people better and will probably lower the traffic going in and out of courthouses.” Tulsa County Court Clerk Sally Howe Smith said going paperless will save money not only on storage, but on man hours because there will be less duplication of efforts. she said often paper documents filed must be retyped into the current system. Documents also have to be scanned. Instead of storing physical records in buildings, they’ll be stored virtually on servers. “This will help us transfer data more seamlessly,” she said. “It will save us wages and postage. We’ll no longer be sending boxes of case information to appeals court judges.” Oklahoma and Tulsa Counties will start using the system after four pilot counties go live in about two years. The system will roll out statewide in about five years. Not just for tracking criminals Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals Judge Jane Wiseman said the benefits of an integrated system reach further than criminals going in and out of courtrooms. “If people think the justice system doesn’t touch them, they’re not informed,” she said. Marriages, adoptions and divorces go through the courts. Small claims matters, including landlord and tenant issues do as well. Some traffic tickets also are paid at county courthouses. Wiseman said in the case of appeals court judges, often delays in moving cases and documents are a holdup. she hopes the new system will speed up justice. “They say justice delayed is justice denied,” she said. “People rightfully complain how long a case can take.” Judge John Fischer, also of the state Civil Appeals Court, said busy judges will be able to keep better track of the disposition of cases, pending actions and caseloads. “You’ll be able to view any aspect of the record immediately,” he said. “When deadlines approach for certain filings, judges and attorneys can be notified electronically.” News Photo Galleriesview all

<a href="http://newsok.com/state-to-unify-court-record-systems/article/3561825tag:news.google.com,2005:cluster=http://newsok.com/state-to-unify-court-record-systems/article/3561825Mon, 25 Apr 2011 05:03:31 GMT 00:00″>Oklahoma has plans to update, unify court record system

, , , ,

Labelling Gun Inks: Some Applications and Uses for Label Gun Inks Explained

Filed in gun uk Leave a comment

Up-to-date labelling gun inks are a nothing like the elementary solutions of the past. Using complex and modern chemical technology enables a greater number of applications for these simple tools than one might consider. what uses have driven this development?

There are many varied and suitable applications for the humble label gun. They can obviously be used for pricing items in the retail. nevertheless, there are uses in business and production routines that make these inexpensive tools perfect for. Managed quality control is imperative in food preparation so label guns can be utilised to indicate sell by dates, production batch or technician or variety information.

The simple hand-held labelling gun produces a label that can be of advanced paper and adhesive, not only giving specific information but also ink. if a particular colour of ink is used, this can convey specific information such as week of the month of production or processing. such information can be conveyed by using coloured paper and ink. another characteristic of the ink is that it may be made temperature sensitive. Using a heat sensitive ink, it is possible to indicate that a certain temperature threshold has been met. this could show if food has been heated to the correct temperature for serving or if medical tools have been sterilised at the correct temperature.

For example, dental equipment is labelled before being exposed to the sterilizing autoclave. The label includes a date printed in ‘thermo-resistant’ ink to signal the day of sterilization and a date to signify the day the sterilization becomes expired, also in ‘heat immune’ ink. Thermo-chromatic ink that changes colour at the designated temperature is marked on the label in between the two dates. this shows that the desired heat has been reached.

Ink manufacturers that the likes of labelling and labelling gun suppliers like Positive ID use, can produce heat indicating inks that will indicate at virtually any temperature. this is obviously restricted to the tolerances of the label material and the label adhesive used but these too are items that can be subject to specific tolerances.

Labelling Gun Inks: Some Applications and Uses for Label Gun Inks Explained

, , , , ,

Steel shot wildfowling cartridges review

Filed in winchester cartridges uk Leave a comment

Wednesday, 04 March 2009

Steel shot wildfowling cartridges: Shooting Super Magnum cartridges is now a reality on our foreshores. Tom’s a fan of them but, he wonders, how many others will use them?

Steel shot wildfowling cartridges: Wildfowlers like me have been waiting ages to give 3&frac12;in super-magnum steel loads a blast on the foreshore. our American cousins have been banging away with 'em for several years of course, but it's only now that the proof authority for Europe (CIP) has given such heavy-duty cartridges in 12 and 10-bore sizes the green light here. the nearest we've been are High Performance 3in shells carrying a lighter payload that can only be fired through guns proofed for steel shot and stamped with a Fleur de Lys symbol. They're okay, to a point, but if you want to shoot geese and duck at longer distances you need to follow the American example which stipulates heavier loads of larger steel shot flying at faster speeds than we're currently used to. For instance this could amount to 13/4oz (44 gm) of BB or T shot (American sizes) fired from a 3&frac12;in 12-bore 'Super Magnum' cartridge. the 10-bore opens up even greater possibilities. Given what we see on American hunting videos and you Tube there can be no doubt that the right steel load can kill giant Canada geese, dead in the sky, even at long distances. I am a big fan of these Supermag shells and I have been disappointed by the lack of availability of these goose-busters from our main UK cartridge manufacturers. only Gamebore with its 'Mammoth Steel' load has come up with a 3&frac12;in Supermag for my Xtrema to eat up. however, Remington, Winchester and Clever Mirage all produce and distribute a variety of Supermag steel shot cartridges in the UK, albeit that they are sometimes difficult to obtain from stock at the gun shop. Why can they import cartridges to us but we are not producing them ourselves, I asked? at 65p-£1 a bang (rrp) these imported Supermags can hit the pocket compared to the UK-made 3in shells which cost about 26 pence a go! Surely the new regulations, agreed by CIP will now mean our UK based steel shotgun cartridge manufacturers can start to churn out the Super- Duper-Goose-Busting-Loads which our American friends have been enjoying all this time? and surely, this extra competition in the UK market will be a good thing for wildfowlers, too? As I say, only Gamebore produces a 3&frac12;in jobbie so if proof regulations are no longer a problem, what is stopping UK cartridge companies from loading the shells I want? According to Brian Jackson at Lyalvale Express it is simply down to market forces – with several different brands already available, the volume of use of these shells on Britain's foreshores won't allow further expansion of the market. Brian believes that changes in the value of the pound in the US and Canada and market growth for steel loads elsewhere in northern Europe would help the situation. If it does, companies like Lyalvale have the machines and component parts to produce top-quality Super Magnum shells that meet the regulations as long as the market is right. Brian points to Denmark as an example of somewhere that is bucking the American trend with hunters demanding light 1oz cartridges loaded into 3in cases which are able to leave the gun at high speed. ABOVE: this brace of greylags fell to a standard steel 3in magnum load. those producing 1520 fps (V2.5m) are extremely popular. While these loads are under the momentum of 15 Newtons required by the CIP for 3inch loads, they do exceed the velocity limit. For this reason, while Lyalvale Express produces 'fast Steel' 28gram 3inch cartridges it can only offer this product in non CIP regulated countries such as Denmark. the debate will continue. Lyalvale's interest in the steel shot market led them to release a new product to the UK last year, the (High Performance) 'Supreme Steel' in 32grams at 1380fps (1425fps Muzzle velocity) 4 shot only. you can see from the picture that this is a top quality shell with a huge 25mm brass head and gold print. I suspect this cartridge is targeting driven game shots using modern guns, but a larger shot size may be needed to consistently kill high ducks and pheasants. Whatever its intended purpose it will be a useful trick in the wildfowlers' toolbox, especially for shooting over decoys. what interests me is that both Brian, and Roger Hancox, master of the Birmingham Proof House agree that CIP missed an opportunity by basing steel cartridge regulations on a 'bottom up' principle. the international proof authority set the limits of velocity and momentum in order to make sure that the cartridge did not damage the gun. Instead, it should've used appropriate science to decide what non-toxic load can reasonably and ethically be expected to kill our quarry at responsible range, 90% of the time. having established that, it could have then worked back to make sure modern guns are built to withstand the use of those cartridges. in other words the onus would be on the hunter to buy a new gun if his or her current one, was not fit for purpose. top and bottom of all this is that market forces are limiting the manufacture of extended ranges of 'wildfowlerish' cartridges in the UK, as the market here is not big enough. So if you want to see more British Bangers on the foreshore, start buying and experimenting with big steel loads and tell your gunsmith you want more! I can't fault them.

Steel shot wildfowling cartridges review

, , ,

WTS: Winchester Ranger 9mm NATO 124gr FMJ 500rd CASE $124.99

Filed in winchester ranger Leave a comment

PAFOA provides space for this marketplace for non-prohibited persons to offer to sell or buy legal firearms with other non-prohibited persons. It is the responsibility of every seller and every buyer to comply with all state and federal laws, which includes verifying the buyer’s state of residence, refusing sales to prohibited persons, and additional requirements. If you’re not sure of the laws, find out. for maximum safety, we suggest doing all transfers of advertised guns through a Federal Firearms Licensee or a Sheriff; this is mandatory for handguns, and mandatory for sales to out-of-state residents, and it

, ,

Winchester Ranger Test

Filed in complete winchester Leave a comment

As an instructor, I get a lot of questions from students about what ammunition is best for defense. like many other questions about self-defense with firearms, the answer is almost always “it depends.” when most self-educated terminal ballistics experts argue on the subject, they usually argue about caliber and bullet weight. Some argue that a slow-moving heavy bullet is best and others argue that a smaller, faster bullet is best. Some argue that a fast and heavy round is best, but many can’t handle the recoil of rounds like 10mm and .45 Super, nor are such guns well suited for concealed carry for most people.

I have come to the conclusion after reading and testing that it’s not so much important how fast and/or heavy a bullet is, but whether the bullet in question is designed to work well under those conditions. even the best combination of weight and speed in any caliber will be nearly useless if the bullet fails to expand and incapacitate a threat.

So rather than argue about how well a bullet performs on paper, I’ve started evaluating rounds with ballistic testing. The first bullet in this series is Winchester’s 155 grain Ranger in .40 S&W. Winchester’s model number for this round is RA40155HP.

First, a little background on the Ranger round. It comes in a box marked “Law Enforcement Ammunition”. While it is true that this round was originally only sold to law enforcement users through law enforcement distribution channels, it is now widely available to any buyer both on the internet and at local retail stores. Prices range from as high as 60 cents per round ($30 for a 50-round box, local retailer) to as low as 30 cents a round if bought in lots of 500 on auction sites.

Originally, this ammunition was ordered by the Department of Homeland Security for the Border Patrol and other agencies carrying .40 S&W, and was in wide use. It met their specification for a reliably-expanding .40 S&W round in 155gr weight traveling at 1200 feet per second. Unfortunately, in later testing it was found that the rounds suffered from jacket separation when fired through relatively weak barriers. The round was dropped in favor of other rounds like Federal Hydrashock.

Much of the ammunition was given to individual officers and agents for target practice. Winchester had a great many of the rounds on hand to sell to DHS, and diverted them to normal distribution channels to recover production costs. The massive supply and the rejection by DHS led to low prices.

The first thing I did when evaluating this round was put three of them through a chronograph. The average speed was better than advertised, averaging just over 1250 feet per second and with the fastest at 1287 feet per second. The test gun was a Springfield Armory XDm with 4.5″ barrel.

While ideally I would use ballistic gel, the expense and stink precluded it. I have read that sufficiently packed wet newspaper has the same effect. To simulate muscle walls and other biological barriers, I packed the wet newsprint in milk jugs.

The Ranger round penetrated approximately 13″ before losing sufficient energy to penetrate a plastic barrier. The bullet expanded from it’s original size of .400″ to about .875″, more than doubling. this rapid and complete expansion left a neat pancake shape with only a small portion of the rear of the bullet resembling the original size. as in DHS testing, the copper jacketing separated from the lead core, but this appears to have happened after expansion of the core was complete. If this round were to hit a more solid target, it is not as likely to penetrate or ricochet in one complete piece.

Basically, what we have with this Winchester Ranger round is a bullet that performs well in terminal ballistics against human targets but not well against barriers. While this would be bad for say, a Border Patrol agent or State Police patrolman, this could be ideal for most defensive shooters. a bullet that performs well against an intended target but fragments against backstops and barriers is far less likely to injure or kill unintentionally when the fecal matter hits the rotary oscillator.

Couple that with the low prices, and this is a bargain for those carrying .40 S&W for defense.

Winchester Ranger Test

, ,

Gun Magazine Articles: Industry Advertisements?

Filed in winchester ammunition Leave a comment

I have been reading gun magazines off and on for 20 years and have come to the conclusion that gun articles are just thinly veiled advertisements for the industry. at one point, I subscribed to seven monthly gun magazines at the same time for 6 years. it was during this six year period, I began to notice some interesting problems in the gun articles I read and I would like to get on my soap box and get them off my chest.

I subscribed to and read gun magazines because I am very interested in handguns and rifles and have owned and traded many over a twenty year period. I subscribed to and read the gun magazines to gain knowledge, and look to experts with more experience then me for advice or recommendations. Now the writers’ in the gun magazines and the gun magazines themselves try to give the impression that they do product evaluations of guns and other related accessories. Some even say they are writing the article specifically to test the gun or ammunition for the readers benefit.

Now back in college, when you said you were going to do a test and evaluation, that required certain protocols to ensure that the results were not spurious, but were valid and repeatable. Now, the only way to give results with any validity is proper “research design”. Unless the testing process provides barriers against any unknown variables, tester bias and maintains consistent methods, the entire procedure and results are useless. Good research design is not that hard and can be done with just a little planning. unfortunately the gun writers often stumble on the first step.

For example, gun writers often begin a test and evaluation article by saying that a particular gun was mailed to them for testing by the manufacturer so they grabbed what ever ammunition was available or called an ammunition manufacturer for some more free ammunition. If you think about this for a minute you will realize immediately that there is already inconsistency in the ammunition tested, and a potential conflict of interest in the results. Ammunition is a key factor in how in how a gun performs.

A 230 grain .45 caliber cartridge from Winchester is not the same as a 230 grain .45 caliber cartridge from Golden Saber. a given cartridge consists of several parts such as the bullet, powder, brass case and primer. a change in any one component can drastically affect the accuracy and performance of the bullet. Additionally, if the gun writer calls up an ammunition company and requests free ammunition, there is a conflict of interest here. Can I trust the gun writer to give me an honest evaluation of the cartridges performance? If he gives a bad review, does the company stop sending him free ammunition? Would you give free stuff to some one who gave you a bad review a year ago?

Moreover, if you test Gun a with a 5 different brands of bullets of various weights and types and then compare it to a test of Gun B with different brands of ammunition of different weights and types, is the comparison valid? I often find it amusing that they give an impression of trying to be serious and precise when the basis research design testing procedure is so flawed, the results are not valid.

The gun articles also tend to just be predominately puff pieces instead of concise and complete reviews of the product. I frequently try and guess in what paragraph the writer will actually begin to directly talk about the product or what the thesis of the article is. in a small minority of writers, I may find the actual beginning of the article in the second or third paragraph, but for the majority of gun writers I find the actual article starts in the 10th or more paragraph. The first ten paragraphs were personal opinion on life, the shooting publics’ perceptions of hand guns or some Walter Mitty dream of being in a dangerous spot where you can count on the product that is the subject of the article.

Next time you read a gun article read it from the point of view of a good editor. does the writer tell me what the object of the article is in the first paragraph, and formulate a position or opinion? How much actual relevant information directly related to the product is in the article versus fluff and filler about other topics. If you hi-light in yellow the facts and key points of the article you will be surprised how much filler there is and how much text you could delete and make the article shorter and better.

I have even read some articles where the author even states that they just received the gun and were excited to test the gun immediately. so they grabbed what ever ammunition was available and went to the range. Some even say they didn’t have a certain brand or the type they preferred at home so they could not test the gun with that ammunition.

At this point you have to laugh. When I read statements like this I find myself saying to the article ” then go buy some!” or “Delay the test until the desired ammunition can be obtained”. Duh!

Then when the writers gets to the range they all test fire the guns differently. even writers for the same magazine do not have similar testing protocols. they test at different temperatures, benches, and gun rests. Some will test with Ransom Rests and some do not. The best laughs I get are from the writers who refer to themselves as old geezers with bad eye sight. after acknowledging their bad eyesight, they then proceed to shoot the gun for accuracy and give an opinion on how well the gun shot!

Now, I do not know about you, but if I was a gun manufacturer, I would not want my new gun to be evaluated by some self described person with bad eye sight. Moreover the magazines themselves should try to establish some testing protocols and younger shooters to do the testing.

Now after the shooting at the range, the writer says the gun shoots well and then describes his six shots into a 4 inch circle at 24 yards or some similar grouping. ok, I am thinking, what does this 4 inch group represent, given the inconsistency in testing procedures? Is this 4 inch group a result of the good or bad ammunition, the guns inherent accuracy/inaccuracy or the shooters bad eyesight or all three? If all three factors are involved, what does the 4 inch group really represent?

Lastly, after reading hundreds of articles, I can’t ever recall reading an article where the writer said the gun was a bad design, the finish was bad, and that they would not recommend it. even on guns that are on the low end of a product line or are from manufactures that make junk guns, no negative reviews, if deserved, are ever given. Especially if the accuracy resembles more of a shot gun pattern, the writer often says “the gun displayed good combat accuracy”. Since most shootings occur at about 3 to 8 feet, this means the gun will hit your 30 inch wide attacker at 5 feet away. (I hope so!) they will not say the gun is a piece of junk that could not hit an 8 inch target at 15 yards if your life depended on it.

Why? because gun writers and the magazines do not buy the guns they test, they get free test models. Only “Gun Tests” magazine buys their own guns. so the writers have to say only good things about the gun and down play negatives, or the manufacturer “Black Balls” them from future guns. The disservice is you, the consumer. you get faulty reviews.

How do you trust what ever the writer is saying? for me, I do not. in fact, I pretty much let all my subscriptions run out years ago, except for American Rifleman.

Now, I read mostly read articles on historic guns. Not articles trying to SELL me on a gun, sight, laser, or certain bullet.

Repetition to Death is also another gripe of mine. Over the years, not that many truly new gun models have come out. mostly manufacturs’ will issue an existing gun with a new color, night sights, finish or some other minor feature. The trouble is the gun magazines and writers treat the new gun color as if it’s the best thing since sliced bread and write a four page article. These articles are usually the articles that contain information that is 95% rehash of information already said for years about the particular gun. usually in these four page articles only two paragraphs is actually new information or interesting.

The gun magazines also tend to repeat articles about the same gun in the same year and year after year. The 1911 is a great example. Start keeping track of the number of times the 1911 model is the subject of articles in gun magazines each and every month. Now the 1911 came out in 1911, and has been written about ever since. Is there really anything out there not known about the 1911? If a new feature on the 1911 is created, does it WARRANT a four page article on a “feature” that could easily be adequately described in a few paragraphs?

If you want to read gun magazines go ahead, just read them with a critical eye. When I read. I read for content. I try and get the following from an article:

1. What is the writers’ reason for writing?

2. What is the writer actually saying?

3. What new information was conveyed?

4. Are the results of any testing process described valid?

5. Did the writer provide any background qualifications or experience?

6. What do I take away from the article?

Handguns are expensive, and unfortunately the magazines are not much help in providing an honest comparison for the beginner. they only say positive things about all guns, the industry and never criticize a brand and or model. “They are all good guns, some are just better then others”? Yeah right.

My recommendation to the beginner. Talk to someone who has been shooting for awhile and has owned and shot a variety of different guns, and has no vested interest recommending one model or brand.

These are only my opinions, but after years of reading the gun articles, I have come to the conclusion that the writers really do not know how to do consistent testing, and the editors have very low standards for accepting articles. I am not perfect either and love shooting, but I would not say every gun is a quality gun or deserves to be bought.

The author also operates: http://www.Cynscorion.com which sells knifes and other shooting related products has written an Ebook on “Ecommerce for Beginners”.

Gun Magazine Articles: Industry Advertisements?

, , , , ,

[Want To Buy] .300 Win Mag Bolt Action Rifle

Filed in rifles winchester Leave a comment

PAFOA provides space for this marketplace for non-prohibited persons to offer to sell or buy legal firearms with other non-prohibited persons. it is the responsibility of every seller and every buyer to comply with all state and federal laws, which includes verifying the buyer’s state of residence, refusing sales to prohibited persons, and additional requirements. If you’re not sure of the laws, find out. For maximum safety, we suggest doing all transfers of advertised guns through a Federal Firearms Licensee or a Sheriff; this is mandatory for handguns, and mandatory for sales to out-of-state residents, and it

, , , ,

TOP